<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Power of Massive Twitter Accounts &#8211; Or Lack Thereof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/</link>
	<description>The Future Is Here Today...Robotics, Genetics, AI, Longevity, The Brain...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:21:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Brockhaus</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-38417</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Brockhaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-38417</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d imagine that it&#039;s still a targeted audience, but people don&#039;t have the time to be such avid consumers of the deluge information. It&#039;s too easy to waste hours upon hours cycling through your network of tweets. 

It&#039;s hard to say if this is merely a function of the ecosystem of tweets vs the rest of the stuff in peoples&#039; lives or simply not the best design for how the information is distributed and consumed. Perhaps the process of opening a link isn&#039;t streamlined enough to sway those who deal with information overload by saying &quot;i might have clicked it, but I&#039;m keeping myself from being distracted&quot;. 

Like you say, Twitter may come and go, but the desire/need for nuggets of communication will stick around. Certainly it does a lot of things right .. but there certainly are pitfalls with respect to theoretical expectations. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d imagine that it&#8217;s still a targeted audience, but people don&#8217;t have the time to be such avid consumers of the deluge information. It&#8217;s too easy to waste hours upon hours cycling through your network of tweets. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to say if this is merely a function of the ecosystem of tweets vs the rest of the stuff in peoples&#8217; lives or simply not the best design for how the information is distributed and consumed. Perhaps the process of opening a link isn&#8217;t streamlined enough to sway those who deal with information overload by saying &#8220;i might have clicked it, but I&#8217;m keeping myself from being distracted&#8221;. </p>
<p>Like you say, Twitter may come and go, but the desire/need for nuggets of communication will stick around. Certainly it does a lot of things right .. but there certainly are pitfalls with respect to theoretical expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Brockhaus</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-38416</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Brockhaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-38416</guid>
		<description>well if the average for these articles was a few hundred ... and these mega-accounts brought in ~5000, isn&#039;t that a significant increase? Of course, tempered against the new twitter followers you gained, that might not be very encouraging. 

And of course, I wouldn&#039;t doubt the content itself had an impact as well. Perhaps if there were an article titled &quot;Transhumanists create Artificial Intelligence that only knows peace&quot; (as much as that probably doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense), I&#039;d bet tweets by mega accounts would get a lot of hits. 

I think it would be interesting to see *Twitter&#039;s* stats with respect to mega accounts and their networks of followers. How many really are idle? How many of those followers actually click on articles from their network? What is *that* percentage of clicks in the context of all possible clicks they could have made? How long does it take a tweet to make it around to as much of the network as it likely will? How many of the followers of mega accounts would follow an account in a tweet of a mega account, if that new twitter account didn&#039;t have the same number of followers? etc etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well if the average for these articles was a few hundred &#8230; and these mega-accounts brought in ~5000, isn&#8217;t that a significant increase? Of course, tempered against the new twitter followers you gained, that might not be very encouraging. </p>
<p>And of course, I wouldn&#8217;t doubt the content itself had an impact as well. Perhaps if there were an article titled &#8220;Transhumanists create Artificial Intelligence that only knows peace&#8221; (as much as that probably doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense), I&#8217;d bet tweets by mega accounts would get a lot of hits. </p>
<p>I think it would be interesting to see *Twitter&#8217;s* stats with respect to mega accounts and their networks of followers. How many really are idle? How many of those followers actually click on articles from their network? What is *that* percentage of clicks in the context of all possible clicks they could have made? How long does it take a tweet to make it around to as much of the network as it likely will? How many of the followers of mega accounts would follow an account in a tweet of a mega account, if that new twitter account didn&#8217;t have the same number of followers? etc etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweetbomb – A Tweet To Shake The World &#124; Singularity Hub &#171; WorldWright&#39;s &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-37458</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweetbomb – A Tweet To Shake The World &#124; Singularity Hub &#171; WorldWright&#39;s &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-37458</guid>
		<description>[...] The Power of Massive Twitter Accounts &#8211; Or Lack Thereof [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Power of Massive Twitter Accounts &#8211; Or Lack Thereof [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin B.</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-30311</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-30311</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed a lot of the media posing questions about what, exactly, is Twitter good for? Recently Paull Carr at TechCrunch (http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/27/im-a-writer-not-a-twitter/) posted that he was quitting twitter, and I completely agree. I had a twitter for a while, and it felt good to get followers. In the end, though, most of them were there because they were the type who followed lots of people, and I had no real &quot;connections&quot;. I recently deleted my Twitter account and am going back to blogging. However, the audience I once had at an old social network is now completely dissolved, as none of them followed me off to twitter-land, and I don&#039;t blame them. I didn&#039;t give anything meaty for them to read, you can&#039;t in 140 characters!

I have seem a lot of blogs go &quot;twitroll&quot;, where the blog simply becomes a collection of tweets pushed through to the blog. Not only is it ugly, it&#039;s hard to read, and uninteresting to read. 

I predicted a couple of years ago that Twitter would never hit it big, and I guess I was wrong. I still think, however, that Twitter is NOT the revolution we are looking for in social media. I think that has yet to come - it brought the speed, now someone needs a way to combine that with bringing back the CONTENT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed a lot of the media posing questions about what, exactly, is Twitter good for? Recently Paull Carr at TechCrunch (<a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/27/im-a-writer-not-a-twitter/" rel="nofollow">http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/27/im-a-writer-not-a-twitter/</a>) posted that he was quitting twitter, and I completely agree. I had a twitter for a while, and it felt good to get followers. In the end, though, most of them were there because they were the type who followed lots of people, and I had no real &#8220;connections&#8221;. I recently deleted my Twitter account and am going back to blogging. However, the audience I once had at an old social network is now completely dissolved, as none of them followed me off to twitter-land, and I don&#8217;t blame them. I didn&#8217;t give anything meaty for them to read, you can&#8217;t in 140 characters!</p>
<p>I have seem a lot of blogs go &#8220;twitroll&#8221;, where the blog simply becomes a collection of tweets pushed through to the blog. Not only is it ugly, it&#8217;s hard to read, and uninteresting to read. </p>
<p>I predicted a couple of years ago that Twitter would never hit it big, and I guess I was wrong. I still think, however, that Twitter is NOT the revolution we are looking for in social media. I think that has yet to come &#8211; it brought the speed, now someone needs a way to combine that with bringing back the CONTENT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin B.</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-32639</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-32639</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed a lot of the media posing questions about what, exactly, is Twitter good for? Recently Paull Carr at TechCrunch (http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/27/im-a-writer-not-a-twitter/) posted that he was quitting twitter, and I completely agree. I had a twitter for a while, and it felt good to get followers. In the end, though, most of them were there because they were the type who followed lots of people, and I had no real &quot;connections&quot;. I recently deleted my Twitter account and am going back to blogging. However, the audience I once had at an old social network is now completely dissolved, as none of them followed me off to twitter-land, and I don&#039;t blame them. I didn&#039;t give anything meaty for them to read, you can&#039;t in 140 characters!

I have seem a lot of blogs go &quot;twitroll&quot;, where the blog simply becomes a collection of tweets pushed through to the blog. Not only is it ugly, it&#039;s hard to read, and uninteresting to read. 

I predicted a couple of years ago that Twitter would never hit it big, and I guess I was wrong. I still think, however, that Twitter is NOT the revolution we are looking for in social media. I think that has yet to come - it brought the speed, now someone needs a way to combine that with bringing back the CONTENT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed a lot of the media posing questions about what, exactly, is Twitter good for? Recently Paull Carr at TechCrunch (<a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/27/im-a-writer-not-a-twitter/" rel="nofollow">http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/27/im-a-writer-not-a-twitter/</a>) posted that he was quitting twitter, and I completely agree. I had a twitter for a while, and it felt good to get followers. In the end, though, most of them were there because they were the type who followed lots of people, and I had no real &#8220;connections&#8221;. I recently deleted my Twitter account and am going back to blogging. However, the audience I once had at an old social network is now completely dissolved, as none of them followed me off to twitter-land, and I don&#8217;t blame them. I didn&#8217;t give anything meaty for them to read, you can&#8217;t in 140 characters!</p>
<p>I have seem a lot of blogs go &#8220;twitroll&#8221;, where the blog simply becomes a collection of tweets pushed through to the blog. Not only is it ugly, it&#8217;s hard to read, and uninteresting to read. </p>
<p>I predicted a couple of years ago that Twitter would never hit it big, and I guess I was wrong. I still think, however, that Twitter is NOT the revolution we are looking for in social media. I think that has yet to come &#8211; it brought the speed, now someone needs a way to combine that with bringing back the CONTENT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyberwarfare &#8211; Virtual Attacks Could Come From Anywhere &#124; Singularity Hub</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-19804</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyberwarfare &#8211; Virtual Attacks Could Come From Anywhere &#124; Singularity Hub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-19804</guid>
		<description>[...] these mercenaries increase significantly. Millions flock to the World Wide Web for their share of real-time information via Twitter and other social media platforms. But in the blink of an eye, a multitude of connections could be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] these mercenaries increase significantly. Millions flock to the World Wide Web for their share of real-time information via Twitter and other social media platforms. But in the blink of an eye, a multitude of connections could be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralf</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-17014</link>
		<dc:creator>ralf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-17014</guid>
		<description>I wonder about Twitter anyway. I made an account, but don&#039;t really use it. Information overload says it. I tend to follow a single persons only, if they I&#039;d established some sort of personal relation to them or their work, maybe an artist, maybe an online friend, or if their information is extremely interesting all the time.
If something interests me, I actively look for info myself, I don&#039;t check hundreds of people&#039;s personal accounts regularily to maybe find something by coincidence that might interest me.
If a topic really interests me, I prefer forums, because there are a lot of people contributing directly to the topic and it&#039;s more efficient than checking out lots of individual accounts for news that might interest me.
Just my personal view at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder about Twitter anyway. I made an account, but don&#8217;t really use it. Information overload says it. I tend to follow a single persons only, if they I&#8217;d established some sort of personal relation to them or their work, maybe an artist, maybe an online friend, or if their information is extremely interesting all the time.<br />
If something interests me, I actively look for info myself, I don&#8217;t check hundreds of people&#8217;s personal accounts regularily to maybe find something by coincidence that might interest me.<br />
If a topic really interests me, I prefer forums, because there are a lot of people contributing directly to the topic and it&#8217;s more efficient than checking out lots of individual accounts for news that might interest me.<br />
Just my personal view at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralf</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-32638</link>
		<dc:creator>ralf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-32638</guid>
		<description>I wonder about Twitter anyway. I made an account, but don&#039;t really use it. Information overload says it. I tend to follow a single persons only, if they I&#039;d established some sort of personal relation to them or their work, maybe an artist, maybe an online friend, or if their information is extremely interesting all the time.
If something interests me, I actively look for info myself, I don&#039;t check hundreds of people&#039;s personal accounts regularily to maybe find something by coincidence that might interest me.
If a topic really interests me, I prefer forums, because there are a lot of people contributing directly to the topic and it&#039;s more efficient than checking out lots of individual accounts for news that might interest me.
Just my personal view at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder about Twitter anyway. I made an account, but don&#8217;t really use it. Information overload says it. I tend to follow a single persons only, if they I&#8217;d established some sort of personal relation to them or their work, maybe an artist, maybe an online friend, or if their information is extremely interesting all the time.<br />
If something interests me, I actively look for info myself, I don&#8217;t check hundreds of people&#8217;s personal accounts regularily to maybe find something by coincidence that might interest me.<br />
If a topic really interests me, I prefer forums, because there are a lot of people contributing directly to the topic and it&#8217;s more efficient than checking out lots of individual accounts for news that might interest me.<br />
Just my personal view at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthur</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-13894</link>
		<dc:creator>arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-13894</guid>
		<description>Regardless, the on/off switch is the most subscribed service in modern human existance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless, the on/off switch is the most subscribed service in modern human existance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Twitter: Tweets Translated Into Any Language &#124; Singularity Hub</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-13285</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Twitter: Tweets Translated Into Any Language &#124; Singularity Hub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-13285</guid>
		<description>[...] to spread wider and more easily when they can be automatically translated into many languages. Twitter accounts with huge numbers of followers (&gt;1 million) may not effect the tweet-sphere all on their own, but think of what power they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to spread wider and more easily when they can be automatically translated into many languages. Twitter accounts with huge numbers of followers (&gt;1 million) may not effect the tweet-sphere all on their own, but think of what power they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Farmer</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-8817</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-8817</guid>
		<description>Before reading your blog, I ran my own little test against my own network of 247 followers, and got a 1.2% response rate.  Your comments are invited.  http://endymionsystems.blogspot.com/2009/10/is-anybody-listening.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before reading your blog, I ran my own little test against my own network of 247 followers, and got a 1.2% response rate.  Your comments are invited.  <a href="http://endymionsystems.blogspot.com/2009/10/is-anybody-listening.html" rel="nofollow">http://endymionsystems.blogspot.com/2009/10/is-anybody-listening.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Farmer</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-31972</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-31972</guid>
		<description>Before reading your blog, I ran my own little test against my own network of 247 followers, and got a 1.2% response rate.  Your comments are invited.  http://endymionsystems.blogspot.com/2009/10/is-anybody-listening.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before reading your blog, I ran my own little test against my own network of 247 followers, and got a 1.2% response rate.  Your comments are invited.  <a href="http://endymionsystems.blogspot.com/2009/10/is-anybody-listening.html" rel="nofollow">http://endymionsystems.blogspot.com/2009/10/is-anybody-listening.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Kleiner</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-8382</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Kleiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-8382</guid>
		<description>Twitter accounts in theory should do better than marketing statistics however, because you are not broadcasting to a random audience.  In theory you are broadcasting to a highly targeted audience that actively wants to see what you have to say.  Sadly, the data shows that a twitter account does not perform much better than a random marketing audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter accounts in theory should do better than marketing statistics however, because you are not broadcasting to a random audience.  In theory you are broadcasting to a highly targeted audience that actively wants to see what you have to say.  Sadly, the data shows that a twitter account does not perform much better than a random marketing audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Kleiner</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-31971</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Kleiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-31971</guid>
		<description>Twitter accounts in theory should do better than marketing statistics however, because you are not broadcasting to a random audience.  In theory you are broadcasting to a highly targeted audience that actively wants to see what you have to say.  Sadly, the data shows that a twitter account does not perform much better than a random marketing audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter accounts in theory should do better than marketing statistics however, because you are not broadcasting to a random audience.  In theory you are broadcasting to a highly targeted audience that actively wants to see what you have to say.  Sadly, the data shows that a twitter account does not perform much better than a random marketing audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Schettino</title>
		<link>http://singularityhub.com/2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/#comment-8314</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Schettino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularityhub.com/?p=5468#comment-8314</guid>
		<description>One half of one percent is pretty standard return in marketing. The most popular tweets probably get around 2%. Occasionally there will be a big hit. The trick is to get a mega account to retweet an offer for something like a cool $20 S.H. T-shirt. That&#039;s $10,000 in revenue for a few seconds of marketing effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One half of one percent is pretty standard return in marketing. The most popular tweets probably get around 2%. Occasionally there will be a big hit. The trick is to get a mega account to retweet an offer for something like a cool $20 S.H. T-shirt. That&#8217;s $10,000 in revenue for a few seconds of marketing effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: singularityhub.com @ 2012-02-10 03:10:50 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk (enhanced)
Cache key:          2009/09/16/the-power-of-twitter-accounts-with-massive-followers-or-lack-thereof/feed/_index.html
Caching:            enabled
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.086s
Header info:
X-CF-Powered-By:    WP 1.1.9
X-Pingback:         http://singularityhub.com/xmlrpc.php
ETag:               "fc007fe9626f823690eafb8aa21efbb4"
Link:               <http://wp.me/phyoN-1qc>; rel=shortlink
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
Last-Modified:      Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:10:50 GMT
Vary:               Cookie
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.9.2.3
-->
