Quantcast

Mark Roth Freezes Worms To Learn the Secrets of Preserving Life

by Aaron Saenz June 17th, 2010 | Comments (5)

Share
Share by email
Import Addresses
Send To A Friend Close
 
 
 
Save time! Click Here to select directly from your AOL, Gmail, Hotmail, or Yahoo! Address Book
Ad
 
mark-roth-paper

Microscopic roundworms can survive extreme cold...if you suffocate them first.

Every year people survive long periods underwater after falling in freezing lakes and rivers. Mark Roth and his colleagues at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center want to know why. A paper soon to be published in the journal of Molecular Biology of the Cell describes how Roth’s team worked with yeast and roundworm cells to determine how they might hibernate in extreme cold. What they found seems counter-intuitive: if you want to survive in the cold you have to starve your cells for oxygen so they stop trying to live. Roth and his team have unlocked another key ingredient in understanding how we might produce suspended animation.

Roth has already reported some success in producing suspended animation in mammals using hydrogen sulfide to starve their cells for oxygen. As we mentioned in our discussion of that project, extremely low oxygen levels seem to be the key for inducing a protective and hibernating state. This recent work with yeast and roundworm embryos gives further insight into what allows cells to enter into suspended animation (more on that below). Ultimately, Roth’s work will allow us to preserve humans after grave injury, putting them into chemical hibernation and maybe freezing them to give them the needed time to reach a hospital. This could save the life of many a soldier on a remote mission. One day, we may also find a technique that allows us to put humans ‘on ice’ almost indefinitely – giving us the means to store people with incurable illnesses, or to let astronauts wait in stasis during long space voyages.

In their research, the team at the Hutchinson Center used two well studied organisms: S. cerevisiae (simple yeast) and the embryos of C. elegans (roundworm). After cooling both species (11-16C for yeast, 4C for worm embryos) for 24 hours, Roth found that more than 99% died (or were unable to live to adulthood in the case of the worms). That’s pretty good indication that cold kills these organisms.

mark-roth-paper-results

Not the prettiest of graphs, but it's very clear: If you freeze roundworm embryos, they almost all die. If you rob them of oxygen first, however, they almost all live.

Then, the Roth team studied how an anoxic (zero-oxygen, pure nitrogen) environment affected each. After being starved for oxygen, both species were again subjected to low temperatures. After 24 hours, roughly two-thirds of yeast cells survived and reproduced while greater than 97% of roundworm embryos lived to adulthood. It’s hard to get clearer evidence than that. Obviously anoxia helped save these cells from death from freezing.

You can see how low oxygen effects the life cycle of the micro-organisms in the following video from the Hutchinson Center. Watch for the effect of an anoxic environment around 1:00, and the revitalization of the worm embryo when oxygen returns at 2:00.

So oxygen starvation can save a cell from a cold death. That’s cool news, but something that Roth and others have known in one form or another for quite some time. The real discovery was this: anoxia saves cells from the cold by stopping the life cycles of the cell.

When a cell gets cold, some of the mechanisms for its reproduction get screwed up. In particular with C. elegans, the cell can’t split and divide but it can still produce some of the microscopic structures (microtubule organizing centers or MTOCs) that reproduction requires. In essence, the cells build the infrastructure for a new cell but never makes the new cell. The results are like trying to build the Eiffel Tower inside your garage – things get crowded quickly. In the first 4 hours after being exposed to low temperatures, 43% of roundworm embryos were producing extraneous MTOCs. By 24 hours, more than 90% had done so. That sort of structural chaos leads to death once things warm up again. Oxygen starvation prevents the roundworm embryo from doing anything, including building MTOCs. When the cell warms up again, it simply resumes its normal routine.

mark-roth-paper-results-roundworm-embryos

These roundworm embryos are disturbed by the extreme cold. Their cells produce extra structures (MTOCs - bright green) which will harm the cell when it warms up again.

Results with yeast showed very similar findings. According to the upcoming paper, “Anoxia-induced suspended animation prevents yeast cells from committing irrecoverable cell cycle errors at low temperatures.” Again, cold temperatures disrupt the cell life cycle. Oxygen starvation stops the cell life cycle so that the disruption doesn’t happen.

If all this sounds overly scientific…well, this is a technical paper, I suppose. But I can make it real simple: If you can somehow put a cell into a zero-oxygen environment, it has a good chance of going into suspended animation. The trick is how to completely rob cells of oxygen quickly. Roth’s use of hydrogen sulfide is a good approach, but this experiment shows that it doesn’t seem to matter how you get the cell to stop its life cycle as long as it does stop.

Which explains, in part, how people underwater can survive freezing temperatures for many minutes, even hours. Something must be robbing them of oxygen extremely quickly. Is it simply a chance side-effect of drowning? A chemical response to the freezing cold? That still needs to be determined, but Roth has shed a lot of light on what’s happening at the cellular level…at least for microorganisms. As he continues with his work we’ll get a better idea of how we can stop the life cycles of cells in more complex species, like humans. The work published here was actually performed in 2009 (alas the speed of scientific publishing is horrifically slow) so you can bet that Roth has already learned more as to the mystery of suspended animation. Give him more time and he may provide a way to preserve our bodies indefinitely. Those of us who are sick and dying may one day have a viable means for keeping ourselves alive until science can cure our conditions. Immortality here we come.

[image credits: WikiCommons (modified), Chan et al MBotC 2010]
[video credit: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center]
[source: Chan et al MBotC 2010, FHCRC News]


 

Related Stories

 
 

Connect With Us

.

Post a Comment

Sort By:

Comments

  • User Picture

    Why does near-freezing water effect human. Is it the homeostais?

  • User Picture

    Take a look at Andjus protocols, cca 1957-1962. Subject: lab rats population. Starts with hypoxia, than fast cooling to +4C. At that temperature, perfusion was performed, and than cooled down to -18C and kept at that temperature for 3-4 days, in solid state. He was able to rewive cca 70% of animals, and they were able to solve the labyrinth again, which means that brain/memory were preserved. Going back to C.elegans would make sense only if some value was added, like a study of physiological chains during hypoxia and suspension. Otherwise, old news.

  • User Picture

    Take a look at Andjus protocols, cca 1957-1962. Subject: lab rats population. Starts with hypoxia, than fast cooling to +4C. At that temperature, perfusion was performed, and than cooled down to -18C and kept at that temperature for 3-4 days, in solid state. He was able to rewive cca 70% of animals, and they were able to solve the labyrinth again, which means that brain/memory were preserved. Going back to C.elegans would make sense only if some value was added, like a study of physiological chains during hypoxia and suspension. Otherwise, old news.

  • User Picture

    Nice piece.

    Because everyone loves a pedant, however, I wanted to clarify that 4°C isn’t freezing, it’s just cold. A lot of things happen at 0°C that don’t happen at 4°C, so demonstrating an effect at 4°C is really not the same as demonstrating it at literally freezing temperatures.

    I mention this primarily because I’m concerned that the imprecise use of the terms “freezing” and “frozen” might lead some readers to overextrapolate these results to literal freezing, which this isn’t.

    The worms were cooled; they weren’t frozen.

  • User Picture

    Nice piece.

    Because everyone loves a pedant, however, I wanted to clarify that 4°C isn’t freezing, it’s just cold. A lot of things happen at 0°C that don’t happen at 4°C, so demonstrating an effect at 4°C is really not the same as demonstrating it at literally freezing temperatures.

    I mention this primarily because I’m concerned that the imprecise use of the terms “freezing” and “frozen” might lead some readers to overextrapolate these results to literal freezing, which this isn’t.

    The worms were cooled; they weren’t frozen.

Get Our Newsletter

Popular On The Hub

Singularity

Martin Ford Asks: Will Automation Lead to Economic Collapse?

Written by: Aaron Saenz 716 days ago

lights-in-the-tunnel

Will the future be filled with cool technologies and endless opportunities or will our own creations lead to eventual doom? [...]

Robots

5 Axis Robot Carves Metal Like Butter (Video)

Written by: Aaron Saenz 605 days ago

metal-helmet-machine

Industrial robots are getting precise enough that they’re less like dumb machines and more like automated sculptors producing artwork. Case [...]

Genetics

Designer Babies – Like It Or Not, Here They Come

Written by: Keith Kleiner 1009 days ago

designer-babies

Long before Watson and Crick famously uncovered the structure of DNA in 1953, people envisioned with both horror and hope [...]

Stem Cells, Gadgets, Robots, Longevity, Health, Artificial Intelligence, Genetics, Body Implants, Cyborgs, Science, Technology, Singularity, The Future!