Quantcast

New Reports Show ‘Artificial Pancreas’ Is On Route To Treat Diabetes

by Aaron Saenz July 7th, 2010 | Comments (7)

Share
Share by email
Import Addresses
Send To A Friend Close
 
 
 
Save time! Click Here to select directly from your AOL, Gmail, Hotmail, or Yahoo! Address Book
 
artificial-pancreas

The Artificial Pancreas is actually a combination of internal glucose monitor, insulin pump, and control software.

An ‘artificial pancreas’ developed with funding from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) could allow diabetics to control their blood sugar automatically. Consisting of an insulin pump, continuous glucose monitor, and advanced control software, the artificial pancreas is part implant and part worn device. It will monitor blood sugar and vary insulin levels without a patient’s need for constant calculation and adjustments. According to recent presentations at the American Diabetes Association Scientific Sessions in Florida, the artificial pancreas has shown great aptitude for treating diabetes overnight and after large meals – difficult times for many diabetics. The device may prove to be the best treatment for diabetes until biological based solutions are completed.

Diabetes is one of the most widespread and costly diseases in the developed world. Linked to the growing obesity epidemic in the US, about 8% of the country has the condition, and its the seventh leading cause of death in the nation. The bodies of diabetics have difficulty controlling insulin levels in the blood, often due to malfunctioning cells in the pancreas. There have been successful attempts at getting stem cells therapies to treat diabetes. While these therapies may prove to be actual ‘cures’ for the condition, they are unlikely to be perfected or widely available for many years. The JDRF, by pursuing an artificial pancreas is essentially looking to provide a quicker solution to managing diabetes.

The artificial pancreas essentially combines two already well researched technologies. The first is the insulin pump, an externally worn device with a tube connected directly into the abdomen which allows patients to add insulin (or glucagon) into their blood stream without using syringe injections. The second technology is the continuous glucose monitor (CGM) which does exactly what its name suggests: continually track blood sugar levels and inform its user when an injection is likely to be needed. The CGM can effectively replace the standard prick-your-finger blood tests most diabetics rely upon. In the artificial pancreas, the CGM is an internal implant which communicates with the outside world via wireless signals. It actually measures glucose levels in the interstitial fluid rather than the blood itself. Bridging the two technologies is a sophisticated software package that translates data from the CGM into commands for the insulin pump. It’s this software, and the related hardware communication innovations, that really set the artificial pancreas above previous devices. With the right code, the insulin pump and CGM can work in tandem effectively regulating a person’s blood sugar within desired parameters for almost any condition.

There aren’t many videos of the artificial pancreas in action, and unfortunately most are old. The following clip from CBS gives a fairly good overview of the technology. Newer, though not necessarily more informative, videos can be found on the JDRF website.

JDRF’s artificial pancreas has enjoyed several successes this year. The first was recorded in the Lancet, as Roman Hovarka and colleagues at the University of Cambridge demonstrated it was equal or better than standard treatments when regulating blood sugar in normal conditions, after exercise, and after large meals. Recent presentations at the ADA suggest that the artificial pancreas is also much better in overnight regulation of blood sugar. Patients staid within desired levels 70% of the time for the artificial pancreas versus just 47% of the time using standard routines. Also presented at the ADA Scientific Sessions was a JDRF funded psychology study on who would likely benefit from and successfully use a CGM. The results from that study (such as teenagers are unlikely to stick with CGM use) will be helpful not just in determining which groups are prime targets for using the artificial pancreas, but in shaping public health decisions in how to get patients to adopt newer diabetes technologies that could save money and lives.

Development of the artificial pancreas has been divided among many different institutions including Yale University, Cambridge University, Harvard Univesity, University California Santa Barbara, and several others – all funded by the JDRF. Furthermore, the project is compatible with several different types of insulin pumps and CGMs already on the market. The diversity in research and commercial devices is a big strength of the project – increasing the chances that an artificial pancreas may actually be a marketable item in the next two to five years (the figure often quoted in press for the JDRF). We should keep in mind, however, that studies into its work are still limited in size. The Lancet research involved just 17 people and not all were tested in each area of interest – large meals, exercise, normal use. This is a promising project, and it may arrive in the next few years, but only if it can show success in several larger trials.

The JDRF, ADA, and other diabetes groups are open about the limitations of an artificial pancreas as seen today. It’s essentially seen as a stop-gap solution to treating diabetics, providing a solution by automating an approach (monitor blood sugar, add insulin as needed) that has been around for decades. Ultimately we’ll want an entirely new way to treat diabetes – most likely stem cell therapies which restore the body’s natural ability to regulate insulin. Genetic research may finally pinpoint the causes for the condition and start treatments early. We should also remember that while diabetes has a genetic component, healthy living styles (eating less, exercising more) can have a positive effect and may help us fight diabetes (and obesity) as a population. As we wait for those techniques to be perfected and adopted the artificial pancreas has the potential to help diabetics live with less concern and more freedom. Let’s hope it continues to see successes in the years ahead.

[image credit: JDRF]
[video credit: CBS]
[source: JDRF, Hovorka et al, Lancet, ADA statistics]


 

Related Stories

 
 

Connect With Us

.

Post a Comment

Sort By:

Comments

  • User Picture

    Most of the people have a faith on insulin to control blood sugar level in diabetes. But now one more research found that Artificial Pancreas is also one of the effective form of medicine to control diabetes. I think, this is really good news for the diabetic people.
    What is insulin

  • User Picture

    Vishal Doshi asked:

    “Could someon say – purposely induce glucose spikes – during a sporting event? when needing to concentrate? ”

    There is danger in this already. Too many Type 1 and Type 2 diabetics “float high” during work, so that they do not get a disastrous low blood sugar, impeding their performance. Over the long term this means more “glycosylation” of the body’s proteins, where those bind to glucose (a *very* reactive molecule), and bend out of shape, negating their function. There is a long list of secondary symptoms from this, and it is the major cause of lower average lifespan for diabetics.

    “or perhaps actively force the glucose level very low?”

    This is a short-term disaster, since low blood sugars starve the brain of the fuel it needs to survive. This is a major cause of death in Type 1 diabetics, because if they go low, their insulin bolus, already injected, just keeps diffusing insulin into the body’s tissues, lowering the available blood sugar further. At some point, unconsciousness happens, and with no treatment, death.

    That is why artificial pancreas development that includes the hormone glycogen to cause the liver to drop glucose into the blood, as well as insulin, which gets the rest of the body’s cells to consume it from the blood, is an inherently safer system.

  • User Picture

    Vishal Doshi asked:

    “Could someon say – purposely induce glucose spikes – during a sporting event? when needing to concentrate? ”

    There is danger in this already. Too many Type 1 and Type 2 diabetics “float high” during work, so that they do not get a disastrous low blood sugar, impeding their performance. Over the long term this means more “glycosylation” of the body’s proteins, where those bind to glucose (a *very* reactive molecule), and bend out of shape, negating their function. There is a long list of secondary symptoms from this, and it is the major cause of lower average lifespan for diabetics.

    “or perhaps actively force the glucose level very low?”

    This is a short-term disaster, since low blood sugars starve the brain of the fuel it needs to survive. This is a major cause of death in Type 1 diabetics, because if they go low, their insulin bolus, already injected, just keeps diffusing insulin into the body’s tissues, lowering the available blood sugar further. At some point, unconsciousness happens, and with no treatment, death.

    That is why artificial pancreas development that includes the hormone glycogen to cause the liver to drop glucose into the blood, as well as insulin, which gets the rest of the body’s cells to consume it from the blood, is an inherently safer system.

  • User Picture

    Oh, my god! It made me cry. Please, I need this. I’m sick and tired of measuring and measuring and taking shots. Then, dealing with hypoglycemic and hyper… Please, bring this into the market, for diabetics sake.

  • User Picture

    Oh, my god! It made me cry. Please, I need this. I’m sick and tired of measuring and measuring and taking shots. Then, dealing with hypoglycemic and hyper… Please, bring this into the market, for diabetics sake.

  • User Picture

    Could this solution be part of being “transhuman”? I.e. could control over glucose levels in the blood actually help a person perform better? Could someon say – purposely induce glucose spikes – during a sporting event? when needing to concentrate? or perhaps actively force the glucose level very low?

  • User Picture

    Could this solution be part of being “transhuman”? I.e. could control over glucose levels in the blood actually help a person perform better? Could someon say – purposely induce glucose spikes – during a sporting event? when needing to concentrate? or perhaps actively force the glucose level very low?

Get Our Newsletter

Popular On The Hub

Singularity

Martin Ford Asks: Will Automation Lead to Economic Collapse?

Written by: Aaron Saenz 716 days ago

lights-in-the-tunnel

Will the future be filled with cool technologies and endless opportunities or will our own creations lead to eventual doom? [...]

Robots

5 Axis Robot Carves Metal Like Butter (Video)

Written by: Aaron Saenz 605 days ago

metal-helmet-machine

Industrial robots are getting precise enough that they’re less like dumb machines and more like automated sculptors producing artwork. Case [...]

Genetics

Designer Babies – Like It Or Not, Here They Come

Written by: Keith Kleiner 1009 days ago

designer-babies

Long before Watson and Crick famously uncovered the structure of DNA in 1953, people envisioned with both horror and hope [...]

Stem Cells, Gadgets, Robots, Longevity, Health, Artificial Intelligence, Genetics, Body Implants, Cyborgs, Science, Technology, Singularity, The Future!