Two Boston Patients Free of HIV After Bone-Marrow Transplant

19 1 Loading

SH 147_#1 BIG

In June, at the 2013 International AIDS Society conference, Dr. Tim Henrich made an extraordinary announcement (13:50 in the video below). Two HIV positive cancer patients are now HIV-free four years after undergoing bone-marrow transplants. Though Henrich was hesitant to declare a full victory, as the virus may yet reemerge—it’s a hopeful bit of news and another clue in the long and vexing search for a cure.

The beginning of this story dates back to 2009, when researchers made a similar announcement about a different subject. Widely known as the Berlin patient, Timothy Brown had been given two bone marrow transplants to rebuild his immune system after undergoing extensive chemotherapy and radiation to combat leukemia.

The transplants contained stem cells from a donor with an HIV-resistant genetic mutation called delta 32. The cellular receptor, CCR5, is the gateway through which HIV invades white blood cells. Men and women with the delta 32 mutation, around 1% of the population, lack the CCR5 receptor and are therefore resistant to most forms of HIV.

Remarkably, Brown not only survived leukemia and three rounds of chemo, but he emerged HIV-free. Researchers were careful to look anywhere the virus might be hiding, even taking brain and spinal fluid samples.

Five years on, the virus is, quite simply, gone.

Brown’s case verges on the miraculous, beating both AIDS and cancer—at the same time. And it was thought the rare delta 32 mutation was a necessary ingredient. But if verified, the Boston cases may show anti-retroviral drugs are just as effective.

In contrast to Brown, both Boston patients suffered from lymphoma, not leukemia. Each underwent a more moderate round of cancer therapy and needed a less complete bone marrow transplant. Critically, neither received stem cells with the delta 32 mutation, but both remained on anti-retrovirals during the transplant and for some years thereafter.

Then recently, following months of tests to confirm the virus was still missing in action, the patients’ doctors took them off the anti-retroviral drugs. Seven weeks and fifteen weeks on, respectively—there’s still no sign of HIV.

How do researchers explain the result?

Brown’s immune system was so compromised, he couldn’t continue anti-retrovirals. But the stem cells with the delta 32 mutation kept the virus from spreading while simultaneously targeting and destroying the few remaining HIV-infected cells.

HIV infected T cell.

An HIV infected T cell.

Though the Boston patients weren’t given stem cells with the delta 32 mutation, they were healthy enough to continue a course of anti-retrovirals. The drugs may have mimicked the cells with the delta 32 mutation by preventing the virus from spreading. Meanwhile, healthy new cells from the bone-marrow transplant eradicated the old, weakened HIV-infected cells—and every remaining virus along with them.

The finding offers a ray of hope for those suffering from the disease. The Boston cases show less destructive therapy may yield similar results to those achieved by Brown. Indeed, while Brown still suffers weakness and pain from his treatment, the Boston patients reportedly “feel great and are leading completely normal lives.”

Researchers remain only cautiously optimistic, noting that, generally, the virus can reemerge after 50 days—or about the length of time the patients have been off anti-retroviral drugs—but it can also take longer, up to six months or a year. Though the results so far are promising, they’ll withhold final judgment for awhile yet.

And even if, like Brown, the patients do remain HIV-free, the procedure won’t likely be replicated terribly often. Bone-marrow transplants and anti-retroviral drug therapy require access to top (expensive) medical care and a donor match for the stem cells.

Further, bone-marrow transplants are very risky. A third Boston patient died in treatment, and in general, there is a 15 to 20 percent risk of death. Brown’s procedure carried a 40 percent risk of death.

In an age when the right drug cocktail can make life livable for folks with HIV, the only ethical candidates for the treatment would be those who are diagnosed with cancer as well as HIV—not exactly a cure for the masses. Not yet, at least.

Image Credit: Nissim Benvenisty/Wikimedia CommonsNIAID/Flickr

Discussion — One Response

  • Olori Eric August 6, 2013 on 1:42 pm

    Good morning everyone, my name is joan from pakistan, I have been suffering from Hiv/Aids for over 4years now, and suddenly, i have spent all my money all to make sure i get healthy all day, but happily, last month january 12th 2013, I came in contact with a traditional doctor also known as a chief priest on a newspaper who is called Dr agbadi who has help much people to cure their aids disease, firstly i taught it was a joke until i contacted him ” ‘dragbadilaguspelltemple@gmail.com’ ” and he said that if i am ready for this work, i told him yes, and he collected my details and told me that after he has finished consulting his oracle he will run back to me on when to go for a medical check up, i was unhealthyling surprise. And truly last week monday Dr Agbadi called me to quickly go for a medical checkup, which I did, only to find out that I was not with any HiV disease anymore, my friends and families who left me before run back to me. I now found out that God in Heaven is using this man to bless and heal us all, he is a great and powerful man, again I say to you sir, that God almightly will uplift you and your great work you did for I and other people. Pls i will sincerely advice all Hiv patient to contact this great powerful man called Dr Agbadi for your solutions now at :dragbadilaguspelltemple@gmail.com he will help you on your Hiv problems…..email:dragbadilaguspelltemple@gmail.com