Tiny Sensor Could Run For Years Harnessing Energy from Environment

16,863 3 Loading
tiny sensor that could run for years

Only 9 cubic millimeters in size, the newest tiny sensor spends most of its time sleeping to conserve power.

The University of Michigan has produced a miniature sensor that harnesses solar energy and could last for years without needing to be replaced. Composed of a solar cell, processor, and battery, the tiny device is only 2.5x3.5x1mm in size - a thousand times smaller than a commercial version of its type. Presented at the International Solid State Circuit Conference in San Francisco this month, the sensor is making waves for its low power consumption as well as its longevity. If adapted to harness thermal or kinetic energy from its environment, the sensor could be embedded in buildings or bridges for years. This device demonstrates how we will stop monitoring objects from the outside in, and start watching them from the inside out.

While the Michigan sensor is remarkably small, it isn't the most powerful micro system we've seen recently. A nuclear powered MEMS device developed by Cornell will enable cybernetic moth spies to transmit information using RF signals at 5 milliwatts. The Michigan device maxes out near 8 microwatts. Still, Michigan's sensor harnesses ambient energy (solar for now, heat and pressure later) and doesn't rely on a nuclear power source (albeit a very clean and safe one).

perpetual sensor

The sensor consists of a processor, solar cell, and battery. An embedded power management unit (PMU) helps keep the processor from consuming too much energy as it stores data into SRAM.

Like many other small electromechanical systems, the Michigan device uses the ARM Cortex M3 processor, a well known 32 bit chip with low power consumption. The real innovation comes in the manner in which the ARM is supplied with power. According to the ISSCC paper, the Michigan team found new ways to control voltages and reduce the energy used by the processor while it is in sleep mode. When the chip is "awake" it actively stores sensor information on temperature and capacitance requiring around 8 microwatts. When the chip is "asleep" it only consumes half a nanowatt - about 2000 times less power than a commercial counterpart. Since the chip only wakes up every few minutes to take readings, the average power consumption less than a nanowatt, which is ridiculously low.

The only real problem I see is that the system has no transmitter. Information is stored in SRAM and presumably stays there until the sensor is retrieved and the data transferred. For many applications, a sensor that could stay active for years and then collected may be a fine solution. However, for continuous monitoring of critical systems you're going to need a transmitter. Of course, that may push the power requirements up from nanowatts to many microwatts.

While most of us probably don't care much about microwatts and nanowatts, it's these improvements in power consumption which will enable some truly remarkable technologies in the future. Embedded sensors in all types of buildings and products may be just around the corner. We could have airplanes with embedded sensors that alert mechanics to long term damages before they became problems. Eventually I think the work done at Michigan will be adapted to enable the use of microscopic robots. As machines become smaller and smarter they will need smaller and smarter ways of acquiring power. Harnessing it from the environment seems like the obvious choice.

[image credits Chen et al, University of Michigan, ISSCC]

Discussion — 3 Responses

  • rickasaurus February 25, 2010 on 3:22 am

    Well, passive RFID might be a good option for getting data out as it requires no power.

  • UncleB February 25, 2010 on 8:26 pm

    The world of our children's children will be much different than ours – save for fissions emissions! The future can be obliterated by the trigger happy folk in Israel and Iran at any moment, and for a moot point? Will magical low power sensors stop human nature? I doubt it. The world will see these devices put to the ugliest possible uses before long, and by the sickest humans too! Look at the deaths in Iraq and the mighty American technologies it took to perform this act! Not a single transistor was not meant for this!

  • ancible February 28, 2010 on 2:39 am

    I would make the case that the amount of disgust you have at the deaths and disturbance in the Middle East is directly because of technology. You are used to seeing humans lead mostly fulfilling, mostly pain and anguish free, mostly free lives, etc. due to the harmonious deployment of technology.

    I believe that most pre-historic people would do little more than shrug at the current state of the world's war injuries (if certainly not at the tech itself). Personally, I would rather be shot by a firearm (especially in an age of abundant anesthesia tech) than suffer a stone axe swing to the hip, facial mauling by a predatory animal, or a medicine free journey through a severe case of tetanus.