Quantcast

New Study Shows Your Ability To Recognize Faces is Genetic

by Aaron Saenz March 12th, 2010 | Comments (20)

Share
Share by email
Import Addresses
Send To A Friend Close
 
 
 
Save time! Click Here to select directly from your AOL, Gmail, Hotmail, or Yahoo! Address Book
 

Scientists at the University College of London, Harvard University, and elsewhere have discovered that not only is the part of your brain responsible for recognizing faces different than the part that recognizes words or art, it is highly effected by your genes. Dr. Brad Duchaine (UCL) and colleagues studied nearly 300 twins (identical and fraternal) by giving them a series of recognition tests. On the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT), identical twins had scores that correlated very well – 0.7, while non-identical twins had a much lower correlation – 0.29. Similar tests for word and abstract art recognition did not show such high correlations. According to their paper published in PNAS, researchers think facial recognition is an unusual phenomenon, a “highly specific cognitive ability that is highly heritable.” This research could lead to a search for those facial recognition genes, possibly in pursuit of a treatment for prosopagnosia and related conditions. Just as importantly, it sheds light on how our genes shape our brain mechanisms, and how we might be able to alter/improve those mechanisms through genetic manipulation.

CFMT sample

Which of the faces on the right match the one on the left? Questions like this helped researchers determine that you inherit your ability to accuractely recognize faces.

The quest for augmenting human intelligence is a fierce one. Our modern civilization is based on years of school attendance – nominally in pursuit of making smarter workers and citizens. It goes beyond that, however: we don’t just want to get smarter through hard work, we want an easy fix. Students regularly use nootropic drugs, herbal supplements are toted as keeping your mind young, and we continually report on studies that hope to find which vitamins and minerals are essential to brain health.

Yet the 21st century approach to making smarter humans is probably going to be genetic in nature. We’ve seen how a single manipulated gene can improve memory and cognition in rats. Now, the CFMT twin study suggests that genes are also responsible for one of our most basic social skills: recognizing faces. Politicians and business executives everywhere would line up around the block if a genetic therapy could be developed to augment facial recognition skills. There’s no sign that such a therapy would be possible yet, but this research suggests that the performance of at least one brain mechanism (possibly many more) is determined by our genes. Which parent doesn’t want a smarter child? Chalk this up as another pressure on society to begin producing designer babies.

It’s pretty rare for us bloggers to be able to participate in the scientific research we report on. Luckily, the CFMT is available to take online. It only asks for a minimum of identifiable information, and takes 5-10 minutes to complete. All you do is study some computer generated faces (like those seen above) and then recognize them in a line up. Pretty simple, and kind of fun. The test is available via Faceblind.org – part of a research partnership between Harvard and UCL interested in prosopagnosia.

I haven’t been able to find online versions of the word recognition and art recognition tests given to the twins (and 1500+ non-twin volunteers). The PNAS paper does show a typical question for each however:

samples of the art and word recognition tests

For both the Abstract Art Memory and Verbal Paired Association Memory tests the image/words on the left would be shown then removed before the images/words on the right would be shown.

It will be interesting to see if this research spawns a dedicated search for the genes responsible for improved (or impaired) facial recognition. Certainly growing databases of genetic samples, and the ever decreasing costs of whole genome sequencing makes that search a reasonable possibility. As we find other heritable cognitive abilities, similar work can be performed. Exhaustive studies of our genes may lead to a better understanding of the ‘genotype of cognition’.

Speaking of studies, why don’t we see how Singularity Hub readers stack up on the facial recognition scale? Take the Cambridge Face Memory Test and post your scores in the comments section. We can get a leader board started. May the best genes win!

[image credit: PNAS, Faceblind]
[sources: Faceblind, PNAS, UCL, Harvard]


 

Related Stories

 
 

Connect With Us

.

Post a Comment

Sort By:

Comments

  • User Picture

    70%

  • User Picture

    72 of 72…granted on one of them, it was pretty much a coin flip in my head.

  • User Picture

    72 of 72…granted on one of them, it was pretty much a coin flip in my head.

  • User Picture

    72 of 72…granted on one of them, it was pretty much a coin flip in my head.

  • User Picture

    Out of 72 faces, you correctly identified 72.
    In other words, you got 100% correct.

    WOOT!

  • User Picture

    90%

  • User Picture

    88%

  • User Picture

    94%

  • User Picture

    92%

  • User Picture

    Results
    Out of 72 faces, you correctly identified 71. In other words, you got 99% correct.
    On our previous version of this test, the average person with normal face recognition was able to recognize about 80% of the faces. If you correctly identified less than 65% of the faces, this may indicate face recognition difficulties.
    For more information about face blindness and other face recognition difficulties, please go to http://www.faceblind.org.

  • User Picture

    70 out of 72 (97%)

  • User Picture

    65/72 a.k.a. 90%

  • User Picture

    82%

  • User Picture

    75%

    What's most interesting is that I 'confidently' expected a much higher score and would have been unsurprised to receive a score of 100%.

  • User Picture

    I thought I was all badass with 96%. Y'all are freaky.

  • User Picture

    Only 58%, but I already knew I had a problem.

  • User Picture

    71 out of 72 99% Damn almost perfect!

  • User Picture

    Out of 72 faces, you correctly identified 60.
    In other words, you got 83% correct.

  • User Picture

    at time of writing:
    71 out of 72 (99%)

  • User Picture

    93%

Get Our Newsletter

Popular On The Hub

Singularity

Martin Ford Asks: Will Automation Lead to Economic Collapse?

Written by: Aaron Saenz 716 days ago

lights-in-the-tunnel

Will the future be filled with cool technologies and endless opportunities or will our own creations lead to eventual doom? [...]

Robots

5 Axis Robot Carves Metal Like Butter (Video)

Written by: Aaron Saenz 605 days ago

metal-helmet-machine

Industrial robots are getting precise enough that they’re less like dumb machines and more like automated sculptors producing artwork. Case [...]

Genetics

Designer Babies – Like It Or Not, Here They Come

Written by: Keith Kleiner 1009 days ago

designer-babies

Long before Watson and Crick famously uncovered the structure of DNA in 1953, people envisioned with both horror and hope [...]

Stem Cells, Gadgets, Robots, Longevity, Health, Artificial Intelligence, Genetics, Body Implants, Cyborgs, Science, Technology, Singularity, The Future!