Cloning Extinct Species: How Close Are We?

25 19 Loading

Will mammoths walk the earth again?

For as long as life has been a feature of this planet, natural selection has been wiping out species with subpar adaptive strategies. Among the casualties: dinosaurs, mammoths, Neanderthals, and all manner of megafauna that we’d all love to see first-hand. Alas, mother nature hasn’t been particularly forgiving of species selected against: for four billion years, extinction meant extinction. That is, until last year.

The exception to this sobering evolutionary rule? The Pyrenean ibex, a kind of goat native to the Pyrenees Mountains between Spain and France. For a century, this subspecies of Spanish ibex had been living on the brink of extinction; on January 6, 2000, the last surviving Pyrenean ibex (named Celia) was naturally selected against via a falling tree. Fast forward to 2009, when scientists used frozen tissue to successfully clone Celia, making the ibex the first species (or subspecies) to become un-extinct. Well, for seven minutes.

Celia’s second incarnation died shortly after birth due to physical defects in her lungs, one of a variety of problems common to cloned mammals (other defects include malformed hearts, compromised immune systems, and developmental delays). Cloning is generally accomplished by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), a process by which a surrogate egg is implanted with the nuclear DNA of the organism to be cloned. But the process is terribly inefficient: Celia’s DNA was implanted into 439 eggs to form embryos, only 57 of which were implanted into surrogate goats, only 5 of which were born, and only one of which was born alive. And that’s what happens with a good genetic sample.

Cloning requires high quality DNA, which is generally in short supply for extinct species. When an organism dies, its cells release enzymes that break down the nuclear chromosomes into short strands of DNA. Over time, this genetic material gets mixed in with bacterial DNA and other life forms that invade the tissue. Nucleotides can also change over time, swapping A’s for T’s and G’s for C’s. By the time we dig up bones of extinct species, they are often too genetically noisy to pick out the original genome. So what options are there?

There are two potential ways to bring long-extinct species back to the present day, and both involve injecting a surrogate egg with the target species’ DNA. The first method is in vitro fertilization of the egg using frozen sperm. This method produces a hybrid between two species (e.g. an elephant and mammoth) and it is only a viable option if the target species’ and the egg donor species’ DNA are similar enough to produce a viable embryo (you can’t implant a dog with a dinosaur). By backcrossing hybrid offspring, breeders could then produce a more pure lineage over time.

The second method of resurrecting ancient species is by pure cloning: emptying the surrogate egg of its own DNA, and injecting it with a copy of the target species’ genome. There are two potential sources of such a genome: researchers can use well preserved (e.g. frozen) somatic cells, as in Celia’s case, or they can build the genome up themselves. No species has yet been cloned with reconstructed DNA, but for long-gone species it might be our best shot.

The mammoth is probably the most likely species to go un-extinct anytime soon. While most researchers feel that frozen mammoths’ DNA is too damaged for cloning, we are close to having sequenced their entire genome (it will be the first completed genome for a long-dead species). Penn State University’s Mammoth Genome Project has sequenced roughly 85% of the mammoth’s DNA; once the MIT/Harvard Broad Institute’s Elephant Genome Project is completed, cross-comparison will allow PSU to close in on that final 15%. But knowing a species’ sequence doesn’t mean it could be cloned: we would either need to stitch together a synthetic version, or alter an elephant’s genome at the relevant sites. We can’t do either yet.

A mouse cloned from damaged frozen tissue (pictured) at the RIKEN Institute

That’s why some ambitious Japanese scientists are betting on frozen tissue instead. The privately funded Mammoth Creation Project aims to resurrect the long-dead species by retrieving frozen sperm from the tundra and creating an elephant/mammoth hybrid. They even plan to make a Critchon-esque “Pleistocene Park” in Siberia to show off their creation to the world. Not much news has emerged on the efforts’ progress, though the theoretical basis of deep freeze resurrection did get a recent boost. In 2008, researchers at Japan’s RIKEN Institute successfully cloned a mouse whose cells had been damaged from 16 years of sub-freezing temperatures – the technique could potentially translate to mammoth tissue as well.

While mammoths often died and froze in the tundra, Neanderthals have (thus far) left us mostly bones. But that hasn’t stopped progress in the Neanderthal Genome Project, a collaborative effort between Max Planck Institute and 454 Life Sciences. Just this May, an initial draft of the Neanderthal genome was published in Science – and it revealed the widely reported gene swapping (i.e. interbreeding) between their lineage and ours. As with the mammoth, the genetic samples were noisy: fragments of Neanderthal genes were mixed in with bacterial and fungal DNA, as well as the human DNA of the scientists who dug it up (in fact, over 90% of the DNA in the samples were contaminant, i.e. non-Neanderthal).  To distinguish which genetic material in bone samples were Neanderthal and which were not, researchers cross compared the samples with both human and chimp genomes.

As with mammoths, there’s a big difference between sequencing a Neanderthal genome and actually cloning one. A synthetically produced genome would need to be packaged into chromosomes that can be replicated in a cell, which we don’t know how to do yet. George Church has suggested that a technique invented in his lab, called MAGE, could be used to alter an induced pluripotent stem cell into the genome of a Neanderthal. The stem cell could then be induced to grow into a heart, arm, or brain of a Neanderthal for research purposes. And what about cloning a whole organism? It’s conceivable, but raises some rather sticky ethical concerns among the public and scientists alike.

In case you hadn’t guessed, dinosaurs are quite a ways off (just try a googling “Tyrannosaur Genome Project”). Ancient species have fewer close extant relatives which we can use for comparison, and their samples are worse for wear. Still, sequencing is getting faster and faster, and we seem to be doing better with noisy and damaged DNA. If we can iron out the difficulties of chromosome packing and clone viability, we can expect more species to join the un-extinct list. And for the roughly 100 species that go extinct every day?  Well, besides slowing human-caused extinction with animal and environmental conservation, we can always put them on ice in a frozen zoo.

[image credit: Steven W Marcus, ExhibitEase LLC; RIKEN Institute]

[source note: some of the Neanderthal cloning progress came from an excellent article written recently for Archaeology, "Should we clone Neanderthals" by Zach Zorich]

Discussion — 19 Responses

  • DaFreak4ever August 3, 2010 on 1:18 am

    I am by no means an expert but wouldn’t it be possible to, once gene sequencing becomes fast and cheap, to sequence the genes of say a 1000 or even more cells from an extinct animal and then cross reference them with each other to cancel out the noise?

  • DaFreak4ever August 2, 2010 on 9:18 pm

    I am by no means an expert but wouldn’t it be possible to, once gene sequencing becomes fast and cheap, to sequence the genes of say a 1000 or even more cells from an extinct animal and then cross reference them with each other to cancel out the noise?

  • ObscureDragom August 3, 2010 on 6:59 am

    I look forward to the Dodo and the Mammoth making triumphant returns to the dinner plate.

  • ObscureDragom August 3, 2010 on 2:59 am

    I look forward to the Dodo and the Mammoth making triumphant returns to the dinner plate.

  • KronosDeret August 3, 2010 on 8:25 am

    Stop eating velociraptorz!!! :D No seriously, smaller less deadly reptiles from the dinosaur era would be great. I know the film ended catastrphicaly but Dino safari would make a LOOOT of money.

  • KronosDeret August 3, 2010 on 4:25 am

    Stop eating velociraptorz!!! :D No seriously, smaller less deadly reptiles from the dinosaur era would be great. I know the film ended catastrphicaly but Dino safari would make a LOOOT of money.

  • Levent August 3, 2010 on 9:20 am

    dinner plate? this is why human is the destroyer of this living planet. Everything is for our consumption, how much do we give back to the earth aside from our own satisfaction.

  • Levent August 3, 2010 on 5:20 am

    dinner plate? this is why human is the destroyer of this living planet. Everything is for our consumption, how much do we give back to the earth aside from our own satisfaction.

  • dagmar August 8, 2010 on 10:13 pm

    You are right Levent! Just what I thought.

    @Obscuredragom, it is so tragic you are so stupid. We all suffer from people like you whom only think about the ‘now’ and the ‘want’, what YOU want. Please understand.. this way our planet is NOT going to survive. Act responsibly! please!! Stop the suffering..
    Im saying this to you but also to everyone who thinks like that, Im sorry but I have to because it is killing me to know so many people go on with their daily bussiness and not thinking trough and destroying so much they cannot truly see because they are so blind..

  • dagmar August 8, 2010 on 6:13 pm

    You are right Levent! Just what I thought.

    @Obscuredragom, it is so tragic you are so stupid. We all suffer from people like you whom only think about the ‘now’ and the ‘want’, what YOU want. Please understand.. this way our planet is NOT going to survive. Act responsibly! please!! Stop the suffering..
    Im saying this to you but also to everyone who thinks like that, Im sorry but I have to because it is killing me to know so many people go on with their daily bussiness and not thinking trough and destroying so much they cannot truly see because they are so blind..

  • GWR August 15, 2010 on 3:28 pm

    I’ve always wanted to see a Wooly Mammoth, but that’s probably not a reason to clone one. However, bringing back extinct species may have the advantage of increasing the gene pool in the present world.

  • GWR August 15, 2010 on 11:28 am

    I’ve always wanted to see a Wooly Mammoth, but that’s probably not a reason to clone one. However, bringing back extinct species may have the advantage of increasing the gene pool in the present world.

  • EricS October 21, 2010 on 11:13 pm

    Isn’t there always the possibility of retrieving DNA from insects that feed on blood that have been preserved in amber or tree sap? Just don’t implant it into frog DNA! They change genders, soon we will have a massive problem with horny transsexual dinosaur-frog-beings!

  • Tess Malone November 7, 2010 on 3:20 pm

    Cloning has been whispered away to quieter circles from mainstream society for the most part and people generally move on to other things to wig over, presuming cloning has fallen out of fashion…however, I’m thinking if they clone a friggin mammoth, somebody’s probably going to notice ;-p

  • Tess Malone November 7, 2010 on 3:23 pm

    PS, and we need to clone proto man so we can finally show the religious buts who think it’s all 6k years old that nope, these babies were here hundreds of thousands of years ago and there weren’t any robes. Dinos are great too but too many of these people think dinos cavorted with Adam and Eve so wouldn’t be convinced. Personally, I’m all for cloning, and for organic body farms without necessary cognition for replacement parts.