Surgeon Uses 3D Printer To Make Models Of Bone – And Saves Hospital Bookoo Bucks

16,421 12 Loading

Thanks to surgeon Mark Frame, 3D printers can now read CT scans and produce bone models at a fraction of the previous cost.

While necessity is the mother of invention, frustratingly high costs can motivate us to ask if there’s another way. Mark Frame, an orthopedic surgeon in training, came up with a new way to make bone replicas that help surgeons plan their procedures. Not that anything was wrong with the replicas they had, but at hundreds or even thousands of pounds apiece, Frame searched for a cheaper way to get the same result. His first production, a plastic bone of a patient’s arm, cost just £77. And everything he needed was right there on the Internet.

Monklands Hospital in Scotland where Frame works typically enlists a bone prototyping shop at a local university to make their models based on CT scan images. They’d put in for a model of a patient who’d fractured his arm. Because of costs they ordered a truncated portion of the bone. The sub-optimal model still cost them more than $1,200.

How Frame came to find a way to make a complete model for £77 is due in no small part to his enthusiasm for “any new tech or gadgets.” In particular, he “couldn’t fail to have noticed this upsurge in talk about 3D printing,” he blogged on the website for Shapeways, the Netherlands-based 3D printing company he used to make his models.

But, as 3D printers don’t normally handle CT scan images, Frame had to find a way to convert the images into a format the printers could use. And, of course, the final product had to be just as precise as those surgeons normally use. To accomplish this he used OsiriX, an image processing package specific for the kinds produced by imaging equipment, such as CT scanners. As OsiriX is open source software that runs on mac OS, Frame was able to use it free of charge. He then used a program called MeshLab – also open source, and free, for Mac – to clean up the image and make them medical quality. Finally, this image was sent to Shapeways for printing. Seven days later the model bone arrived in the mail. All for £77.

The CT scan used for the model shown above.

Verification showed that he had indeed made an identical copy of the real bone. And not only did the model prove a valuable anatomical guide, the hard plastic used to cast the model, Frame found, was great for practicing procedures with the actual drills, saws, and screws they used in operations.

“All in all Shapeways has opened up rapid prototyping to everyone no matter what the budget,” he writes in the blog.

They’ve since gone on to make a model of an entire pelvis, which cost them £150. With the old method the models themselves would sometimes cost just as much as the procedure, and so they wouldn’t make them. With Frame’s method cost becomes a non-issue.

What do veteran orthopedic surgeons at Monklands Hospital think of the trainee’s scheme? Not only at Monklands but surgeons at hospitals in the West of Scotland have asked for his help in ordering models. The more models, the less change of a complication during surgery. Frame has actually written up the procedure and has submitted it to the World Journal of Science Technology so that surgeons worldwide can benefit and save lots of cash. In these times of budget cuts and struggling hospitals, it’s sure to get real popular real fast. And if you don't feel like bothering with the paper, Frame and colleagues have started a company that makes the models for you. Just send 3D-OM your CT scan and they'll send you back your model. Heck, it's so cheap now, if you've got a CT scan you might just want to get the model for fun.

So yet another part of our world – and our bodies – is forged from a 3D printer. Toys, robots, sculptures, even human kidneys. I wonder what imaginative people like Mark Frame will think of next. And maybe there’s a lesson to be learned here. Maybe, instead of simply following the status quo we should ask ourselves if there are better ways to get something done. Frame didn’t invent anything, he just had the creativity to bring together existing technologies in a new way. What new uses and technologies are sitting under our noses right now, waiting for us to merge disparate instruments into a new, unitary whole. One thing’s for sure, we have a lot to work with.

[image credits: Shapeways]
images: Shapeways

Peter Murray

Peter Murray was born in Boston in 1973. He earned a PhD in neuroscience at the University of Maryland, Baltimore studying gene expression in the neocortex. Following his dissertation work he spent three years as a post-doctoral fellow at the same university studying brain mechanisms of pain and motor control. He completed a collection of short stories in 2010 and has been writing for Singularity Hub since March 2011.

Discussion — 12 Responses

  • vladgozman November 15, 2011 on 9:49 am

    Related talk about the possibilities of 3D printing from our TEDxVienna:

  • Joe Nickence November 16, 2011 on 12:22 am

    Freaking awesome! But on a related side note, what a horrible case of osteoporosis!

  • WellEducated November 16, 2011 on 2:09 pm

    What a grammatical tragedy in the title. “Bookoo”. Really? Is that how you think it is spelled? Really?

    Try “beaucoup.” It’s a word we got from French. It’s something I learned in about 6th grade. Please fix your title.

  • Khannea Suntzu November 24, 2011 on 10:17 am
  • Jello November 24, 2011 on 6:35 pm

    The Beaucoup error is really jarring for me >.< Enough that I made an account.

  • admin November 25, 2011 on 8:13 am

    Other than pedantic readers, most readers will be more comfortable with the slang spelling. That is why we went with it.

  • Kooshi November 25, 2011 on 11:37 am

    This is the first time I’ve ever made an account specifically to comment on some random article, but your use of the “slang spelling” of beaucoup is immature. I’ve never seen anyone use this spelling, and as far as I’m concerned, any educated person who knows the word, should know how it’s spelled. Also considering that you tout articles about “science, technology, and the future of mankind,” I would assume you target well educated readers. So why don’t you make yourself look respectable, and fix the damn spelling, rather than insult your readers both by assuming they’re too uncivilized to be comfortable with a french word, and calling the others “pedantic.”

  • Quantumfog December 4, 2011 on 12:53 am

    Like Kooshi, I’m creating an account to say its spelled “beaucoup”, not the way your thirty year old beer swilling grandmother taught you.

    With that, I’m deleting this site from my bookmarks.

  • Drazil January 21, 2013 on 8:55 am

    is it possible to make bone structures other then just human bone?

  • Cameron Droddy July 29, 2013 on 4:01 am

    beau coup* French.

  • James Smith October 3, 2013 on 5:09 am

    Learn to spell Beau coup. Ignorance never adds to credibility.