These Were Our Favorite Tech Stories From Around the Web in 2020

Share
This time last year we were commemorating the end of a decade and looking ahead to the next one. Enter the year that felt like a decade all by itself: 2020. News written in January, the before-times, feels hopelessly out of touch with all that came after. Stories published in the early days of the pandemic are, for the most part, similarly naive.
The year's news cycle was swift and brutal, ping-ponging from pandemic to extreme social and political tension, whipsawing economies, and natural disasters. Hope. Despair. Loneliness. Grief. Grit. More hope. Another lockdown. It's been a hell of a year.
Though 2020 was dominated by big, hairy societal change, science and technology took significant steps forward. Researchers singularly focused on the pandemic and collaborated on solutions to a degree never before seen. New technologies converged to deliver vaccines in record time. The dark side of tech, from biased algorithms to the threat of omnipresent surveillance and corporate control of artificial intelligence, continued to rear its head.
Meanwhile, AI showed uncanny command of language, joined Reddit threads, and made inroads into some of science's grandest challenges. Mars rockets flew for the first time, and a private company delivered astronauts to the International Space Station. Deprived of night life, concerts, and festivals, millions traveled to virtual worlds instead. Anonymous jet packs flew over LA. Mysterious monoliths appeared and disappeared worldwide.
It was all, you know, very 2020. For this year's (in-no-way-all-encompassing) list of fascinating stories in tech and science, we tried to select those that weren't totally dated by the news, but rose above it in some way. So, without further ado: This year's picks.
How Science Beat the Virus
Ed Yong | The Atlantic
"Much like famous initiatives such as the Manhattan Project and the Apollo program, epidemics focus the energies of large groups of scientists. ...But 'nothing in history was even close to the level of pivoting thatâs happening right now,' Madhukar Pai of McGill University told me. ... No other disease has been scrutinized so intensely, by so much combined intellect, in so brief a time."
âIt Will Change Everythingâ: DeepMindâs AI Makes Gigantic Leap in Solving Protein Structures
Ewen Callaway | Nature
âIn some cases, AlphaFoldâs structure predictions were indistinguishable from those determined using âgold standardâ experimental methods such as X-ray crystallography and, in recent years, cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). AlphaFold might not obviate the need for these laborious and expensive methodsâyetâsay scientists, but the AI will make it possible to study living things in new ways.â
OpenAIâs Latest Breakthrough Is Astonishingly Powerful, But Still Fighting Its Flaws
James Vincent | The Verge
âWhat makes GPT-3 amazing, they say, is not that it can tell you that the capital of Paraguay is AsunciĂłn (it is) or that 466 times 23.5 is 10,987 (itâs not), but that itâs capable of answering both questions and many more beside simply because it was trained on more data for longer than other programs. If thereâs one thing we know that the world is creating more and more of, itâs data and computing power, which means GPT-3âs descendants are only going to get more clever.â
Artificial General Intelligence: Are We Close, and Does It Even Make Sense to Try?
Will Douglas Heaven | MIT Technology Review
âA machine that could think like a person has been the guiding vision of AI research since the earliest daysâand remains its most divisive idea. âŚSo why is AGI controversial? Why does it matter? And is it a reckless, misleading dreamâor the ultimate goal?â
The Dark Side of Big Techâs Funding for AI Research
Tom Simonite | Wired
âTimnit Gebruâs exit from Google is a powerful reminder of how thoroughly companies dominate the field, with the biggest computers and the most resources. âŚ[Meredith] Whittaker of AI Now says properly probing the societal effects of AI is fundamentally incompatible with corporate labs. âThat kind of research that looks at the power and politics of AI is and must be inherently adversarial to the firms that are profiting from this technology.âiâ
Weâre Not Prepared for the End of Mooreâs Law
David Rotman | MIT Technology Review
âQuantum computing, carbon nanotube transistors, even spintronics, are enticing possibilitiesâbut none are obvious replacements for the promise that Gordon Moore first saw in a simple integrated circuit. We need the research investments now to find out, though. Because one prediction is pretty much certain to come true: weâre always going to want more computing power.â
Inside the Race to Build the Best Quantum Computer on Earth
Gideon Lichfield | MIT Technology Review
âRegardless of whether you agree with Googleâs position [on âquantum supremacyâ] or IBMâs, the next goal is clear, Oliver says: to build a quantum computer that can do something useful. âŚThe trouble is that itâs nearly impossible to predict what the first useful task will be, or how big a computer will be needed to perform it.â
The Secretive Company That Might End Privacy as We Know It
Kashmir Hill | The New York Times
âSearching someone by face could become as easy as Googling a name. Strangers would be able to listen in on sensitive conversations, take photos of the participants and know personal secrets. Someone walking down the street would be immediately identifiableâand his or her home address would be only a few clicks away. It would herald the end of public anonymity.â
Wrongfully Accused by an Algorithm
Kashmir Hill | The New York Times
âMr. Williams knew that he had not committed the crime in question. What he could not have known, as he sat in the interrogation room, is that his case may be the first known account of an American being wrongfully arrested based on a flawed match from a facial recognition algorithm, according to experts on technology and the law.â
Predictive Policing Algorithms Are Racist. They Need to Be Dismantled.
Will Douglas Heaven | MIT Technology Review
âA number of studies have shown that these tools perpetuate systemic racism, and yet we still know very little about how they work, who is using them, and for what purpose. All of this needs to change before a proper reckoning can take pace. Luckily, the tide may be turning."
The Panopticon Is Already Here
Ross Andersen | The Atlantic
âArtificial intelligence has applications in nearly every human domain, from the instant translation of spoken language to early viral-outbreak detection. But Xi [Jinping] also wants to use AIâs awesome analytical powers to push China to the cutting edge of surveillance. He wants to build an all-seeing digital system of social control, patrolled by precog algorithms that identify potential dissenters in real time.â
The Case For Cities That Arenât Dystopian Surveillance States
Cory Doctorow | The Guardian
âImagine a human-centered smart city that knows everything it can about things. It knows how many seats are free on every bus, it knows how busy every road is, it knows where there are short-hire bikes available and where there are potholes. âŚWhat it doesnât know is anything about individuals in the city.â
The Modern World Has Finally Become Too Complex for Any of Us to Understand
Tim Maughan | OneZero
âOne of the dominant themes of the last few years is that nothing makes sense. âŚI am here to tell you that the reason so much of the world seems incomprehensible is that it is incomprehensible. From social media to the global economy to supply chains, our lives rest precariously on systems that have become so complex, and we have yielded so much of it to technologies and autonomous actors that no one totally comprehends it all.â
The Conscience of Silicon Valley
Zach Baron | GQ
âWhat I really hoped to do, I said, was to talk about the future and how to live in it. This year feels like a crossroads; I do not need to explain what I mean by this. âŚI want to destroy my computer, through which I now work and 'have drinks' and stare at blurry simulations of my parents sometimes; I want to kneel down and pray to it like a god. I want someoneâI want Jaron Lanierâto tell me where weâre going, and whether itâs going to be okay when we get there. Lanier just nodded. All right, then.â
Be Part of the Future
Sign up to receive top stories about groundbreaking technologies and visionary thinkers from SingularityHub.


Yes to Tech Optimism. And Pessimism.
Shira Ovide | The New York Times
âTechnology is not something that exists in a bubble; it is a phenomenon that changes how we live or how our world works in ways that help and hurt. That calls for more humility and bridges across the optimism-pessimism divide from people who make technology, those of us who write about it, government officials and the public. We need to think on the bright side. And we need to consider the horribles.â
How Afrofuturism Can Help the World Mend
C. Brandon Ogbunu | Wired
ââŚ[W. E. B. DuBois'] 'The Comet' helped lay the foundation for a paradigm known as Afrofuturism. A century later, as a comet carrying disease and social unrest has upended the world, Afrofuturism may be more relevant than ever. Its vision can help guide us out of the rubble, and help us to consider universes of better alternatives.â
Wikipedia Is the Last Best Place on the Internet
Richard Cooke | Wired
âMore than an encyclopedia, Wikipedia has become a community, a library, a constitution, an experiment, a political manifestoâthe closest thing there is to an online public square. It is one of the few remaining places that retains the faintly utopian glow of the early World Wide Web.â
Can Genetic Engineering Bring Back the American Chestnut?
Gabriel Popkin | The New York Times Magazine
âThe geneticistsâ research forces conservationists to confront, in a new and sometimes discomfiting way, the prospect that repairing the natural world does not necessarily mean returning to an unblemished Eden. It may instead mean embracing a role that weâve already assumed: engineers of everything, including nature.â
At the Limits of Thought
David C. Krakauer | Aeon
âA schism is emerging in the scientific enterprise. On the one side is the human mind, the source of every story, theory, and explanation that our species holds dear. On the other stand the machines, whose algorithms possess astonishing predictive power but whose inner workings remain radically opaque to human observers.â
Is the Internet Conscious? If It Were, How Would We Know?
Meghan OâGieblyn | Wired
âDoes the internet behave like a creature with an internal life? Does it manifest the fruits of consciousness? There are certainly moments when it seems to. Google can anticipate what youâre going to type before you fully articulate it to yourself. Facebook ads can intuit that a woman is pregnant before she tells her family and friends. It is easy, in such moments, to conclude that youâre in the presence of another mindâthough given the human tendency to anthropomorphize, we should be wary of quick conclusions.â
The Internet Is an Amnesia Machine
Simon Pitt | OneZero
âThere was a time when I didnât know what a Baby Yoda was. Then there was a time I couldnât go online without reading about Baby Yoda. And now, Baby Yoda is a distant, shrugging memory. Soon there will be a generation of people who missed the whole thing and for whom Baby Yoda is as meaningless as it was for me a year ago.â
Digital Pregnancy Tests Are Almost as Powerful as the Original IBM PC
Tom Warren | The Verge
âEach test, which costs less than $5, includes a processor, RAM, a button cell battery, and a tiny LCD screen to display the result. âŚFoone speculates that this device is âprobably faster at number crunching and basic I/O than the CPU used in the original IBM PC.â IBMâs original PC was based on Intelâs 8088 microprocessor, an 8-bit chip that operated at 5Mhz. The difference here is that this is a pregnancy test you pee on and then throw away.â
The Party Goes on in Massive Online Worlds
Cecilia DâAnastasio | Wired
âWeâre more stand-outside types than the types to cast a flashy glamour spell and chat up the nearest cat girl. But, hey, itâs Final Fantasy XIV online, and where my body sat in New York, the epicenter of Americaâs Covid-19 outbreak, there certainly werenât any parties.â
The Facebook Groups Where People Pretend the Pandemic Isnât Happening
Kaitlyn Tiffany | The Atlantic
âLosing track of a friend in a packed bar or screaming to be heard over a live band is not something thatâs happening much in the real world at the moment, but it happens all the time in the 2,100-person Facebook group 'a group where we all pretend weâre in the same venue.' So does losing shoes and Juul pods, and shouting matches over which bands are the saddest, and therefore the greatest.â
Did You Fly a Jetpack Over Los Angeles This Weekend? Because the FBI Is Looking for You
Tom McKay | Gizmodo
âDid you fly a jetpack over Los Angeles at approximately 3,000 feet on Sunday? Some kind of tiny helicopter? Maybe a lawn chair with balloons tied to it? If the answer to any of the above questions is 'yes,' you should probably lay low for a while (by which I mean cool it on the single-occupant flying machine). Thatâs because passing airline pilots spotted you, and now itâs this whole thing with the FBI and the Federal Aviation Administration, both of which are investigating.â
Image Credit: Thomas Kinto / Unsplash
Related Articles

Epigenetic Editing Could Wipe Out Chronic Hepatitis B Infections

Google DeepMind Gives AI-Designed Proteins a Watermark

This Weekâs Awesome Tech Stories From Around the Web (Through October 3)
What weâre reading
