Scientists Say They Can Bring Back the Dodo. Should They?

With a massive beak, googly eyes, rotund body, and disproportionately small feathered tail, the dodo is iconic for all the wrong reasons. The flightless bird vanished in the seventeenth century, and has since been the poster child for human-caused extinction.

But what if we can bring the iconic bird back?

Recently, a biotech company based in Dallas, Texas called Colossal Biosciences announced an audacious plan to “de-extinct” the dodo. Founded by Harvard geneticist George Church and tech entrepreneur Ben Lamm in 2021, the company has ongoing projects to recreate the woolly mammoth and the thylacine, or Tasmanian tiger.

The dodo has now joined this lineup. Similar to previous projects, resurrecting the iconic bird requires huge advances in genetic engineering, stem cell biology, artificial wombs, and animal husbandry. Whether they can fit into a whole new world—300 years later—is hotly debated. Even if the technology works, the resulting “hacked” species would raise a big philosophical question: at what point does resembling a dodo genetically equate to resurrecting the species?

But for Colossal Biosciences, the challenge is worth it.

“A goal here is to create an animal that can be physically and psychologically well in the environment in which it lives,” said Dr. Beth Shapiro, a scientific advisory board member at Colossal Biosciences. A professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, Shapiro has had a decades-long fascination with the extinct bird.

Other experts in the field are cautiously optimistic, if just for the attention brought to conservation. “It’s incredibly exciting that there’s that kind of money available,” said Dr. Thomas Jensen, a cell and molecular reproductive physiologist at Wells College, to Nature. Whether it’ll work out, he added, remains to be seen.

A Genetic Egghunt

The de-extinction playbook is already laid out.

Step one, decode the extinct animal’s genome. Step two, find its nearest living cousin. Step three, screen for genetic differences, and replace the living animal’s DNA code with that of the extinct species. Finally, produce an embryo that can be brought to life in a surrogate species.

Yeah, it’s not exactly a walk in the park.

Thanks to Shapiro, Colossal has already nailed the first two steps. Back in 2002, her team sequenced a chunk of the bird’s mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which lives inside the cell’s energy-producing factories, the mitochondria. These genetic codes are passed down solely through the maternal line. Comparing the dodo’s mtDNA with that of their living cousins, the team honed in on the Nicobar pigeon, a peacock-colored bird that roams from the Indian Andamans to the Solomons and New Guinea, as their closest living relative. The two birds shared a common ancestor roughly 30 to 50 million years ago, wrote Shapiro in a 2016 study.

Early last year, she announced that her team has sequenced the entire dodo genome from a museum sample, although the results have yet to be published in a scientific journal. By comparing the dodo’s genome sequences to that of the Nicobar, it’s now possible to hunt down DNA changes that define the dodo—and pinpoint genetic changes needed to transform a Nicobar into its long-extinct cousin.

An Avian Headache

Here’s where the playbook changes.

In mammals, the edited genome—one that resembles the extinct species—is transplanted into an egg cell of its closet cousin and developed into an embryo. The embryo is then brought to life inside the surrogate womb of a living species, a method akin to cloning.

It doesn’t work for birds.

Cloning a species requires access to an egg cell that’s sufficiently developed so it can be fertilized. This stage is hard to capture in avian species because eggs are encapsulated in a hard shell. Then there’s the problem of reintroducing a cloned embryo back into the body.

Colossal decided to go with a different method for assisted reproduction: using primordial germ cells (PGCs). True to their name, these cells can transform into both sperm and egg-producing cells. The company plans to extract these flexible reproductive “blank slates” from developing Nicobars and edit their DNA sequences to better match those of the dodo using tools such as CRISPR.

It’s a hard task. Most genetic tools are optimized for mammalian species, but those for birds are sorely lacking. So far, scientists have struggled to introduce just a single genetic change into quails. Editing the Nicobar will require thousands of precise DNA changes simultaneously.

Then comes the surrogate challenge. “Dodo eggs are much, much larger than Nicobar pigeon eggs, you couldn’t grow a dodo inside of a Nicobar egg,” said Jensen. He would know: his team inserted PGCs into chicken eggs, creating chimeric chickens that can generate quail sperm (but not eggs). Finding a potential surrogate match for a wild, extinct species is far more challenging.

That said, the rest of the process may be relatively smooth sailing.

In mammals, fetuses are heavily influenced by signals and molecules from the mother’s womb. We can’t yet predict how an extinct species interacts with its surrogate modern mom during pregnancy. In contrast, the bird egg is a relatively insulated environment and the process should be simpler, predicts Shapiro, because “everything happens in an egg.”

What if It Works?

Colossal isn’t the only company trying to bring back extinct avian species.

Revive & Restore, a company based in California has focused on genetically rescuing endangered and extinct species, including the passenger pigeon. Another example of man-driven extinction, the passenger pigeon was essential for maintaining the ecology of their forest habitats. Dubbed “The Great Passenger Pigeon Comeback,” the project is now entering its eleventh year. The project spearheaded the use of CRISPR-Cas9 bird models—engineering modern bird species with genetically inserted Cas9—to accelerate genetic edits, while researching methods to carefully re-introduce the birds back into their environment.

With rapid progress in genome editing and reproductive technologies, these de-extinction moonshot projects may just work out. But would the resulting animal actually be a “resurrected” species?

To Dr. Mikkel Sinding at the University of Copenhagen, we need to consider both nature and nurture. Genetics is just one aspect that defines a species; societal interactions and the environment further shape a species’ behavior. But for a “resurrected” dodo, “there is nobody around to teach the dodo how to be a dodo,” he said.

Then there are ecological concerns. Even if the dodo retains its natural instincts, the world its ancestors knew hasn’t existed for 300 years. The bird originally thrived in Mauritius. Today, the island is facing deteriorating forests, oil leaks, and plastics in its surrounding waters. Would an engineered dodo survive in that ecosystem? And if not, is it ethical to raise the creatures solely inside a zoo or otherwise controlled environment purely for our enjoyment?

These questions don’t yet have an answer. However, scientists hope the dodo may highlight environmental issues due to their superstar power. The project could help propel efforts to restore the island’s natural ecosystem, including endemic plants and other animals. In terms of technology, lessons learned along the way could cross over into biotech and medicine—for example, PGC-aided reproduction—ultimately with a far wider reach than de-extinction.

“There’s a new set of potential tools here, a new set of possibilities and opportunities,” said Dr. Ronald Sandler, the director of the Ethics Institute at Northeastern University in Boston.

Update (5/2/2021): Removed a direct quotation to clarify which avian de-extinction technologies are currently being pursued by who and added context detailing existing work in the field of avian de-extinction (Revive & Restore)

Image Credit: Gronvold

Shelly Fan
Shelly Fan
Shelly Xuelai Fan is a neuroscientist-turned-science writer. She completed her PhD in neuroscience at the University of British Columbia, where she developed novel treatments for neurodegeneration. While studying biological brains, she became fascinated with AI and all things biotech. Following graduation, she moved to UCSF to study blood-based factors that rejuvenate aged brains. She is the co-founder of Vantastic Media, a media venture that explores science stories through text and video, and runs the award-winning blog Her first book, "Will AI Replace Us?" (Thames & Hudson) was published in 2019.
Don't miss a trend
Get Hub delivered to your inbox